Publications

• February 6, 2007 Innovation or Imitation? China’s Bid to Become a Global Leader in Nanotechnology Nano in China Richard Appelbaum
• February 6, 2007 China, Nanotechnology, and the Environment Nano in China Evan Michelson, Louise Yeung
• February 6, 2007 China’s Emerging Innovation Trajectory: Nanotechnology and the Role of the 15 Year Medium to Long-Term S&T Plan Nano in China Denis Fred Simon
• December 5, 2006 What Drives Public Acceptance of Nanotechnology? Dreaming of a Nanotech Christmas Published in Nature Nanotechnology 1 Steve Currall
• November 16, 2006 Safe Handling of Nanotechnology Nature Article Andrew Maynard
• October 10, 2006 Statement of Michael R. Taylor at FDA hearing Public Meeting on Nanotechnology Materials in FDA-Regulated Products Michael R. Taylor
• October 10, 2006 FDA and Nanotechnology: Public Perceptions Matter FDA Hearings Project Director David Rejeski’s Comments at the FDA hearings David Rejeski
• October 5, 2006 FDA-Regulated Products Containing Nanotechnology Materials Submission Update David Rejeski
• October 1, 2006 Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA Have the Tools it Needs? PEN 5, October 2006 Michael R. Taylor
• September 28, 2006 Comments on the UK Government’s response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering report Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies has submitted comments on the United Kingdom (UK) Government’s response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering report “Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties.” David Rejeski

• prev
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• next